Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digest / Banks And Banking

Banks And Banking

Feed Subscription

Banks & Banking – Debit Posting Order – Overdraft Fees – Constitutional – Supremacy Clause – State Law Claims – Tort/Negligence (access required)

King v. Carolina First Bank (Lawyers Weekly No. 002-123-14, 13 pp.) (Timothy Cain, J.) 6:13-cv-02264; D.S.C. Holding: In state-law claims, plaintiffs challenge the defendant-bank’s practice of posting daily debits from highest in value to lowest, thereby increasing plaintiffs’ overdraft fees. ...

Read More »

Banks & Banking – Mortgages – Real Property – Toal Administrative Order – HAMP – Tort/Negligence (access required)

Weber v. Bank of America, N.A If plaintiffs base their claim – that defendant did not properly process plaintiffs’ requests for a loan modification – on Chief Justice Toal’s Administrative Order 2011-05-02-01, they should have made their petition in the court adjudicating their foreclosure action

Read More »

Banks & Banking – Real Property – Mortgages – Verification of Deposit – Tort/Negligence – Duty (access required)

Midland Mortgage Corp. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Even though the defendant-bank provided a false verification of deposit (VOD) when the plaintiff-lender requested the VOD in the context of a mortgage closing, plaintiff has not shown that defendant owed it a duty of care under the banking circumstances of this case.

Read More »

Banks & Banking – Mortgages – Real Property – Pay-Off – Failure to Cancel — Attorneys (access required)

Regions Bank v. Strawn The defendant-attorney presented evidence that, as part of a real property closing, his employee hand-delivered to the plaintiff-bank a pay-off check and a letter requesting that the bank’s mortgage on the property be marked satisfied.

Read More »

Banks & Banking – Constitutional – TARP & EEPA – Real Property – Foreclosure (access required)

First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Spirakis The third-party plaintiff seeks actual and punitive damages against third-party defendants the U.S. Treasury Department and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for their actions involving the distribution of TARP funds, but nowhere in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) or the Administrative Procedure Act is there a provision permitting money damages for alleged injury caused by actions taken pursuant to the EESA.

Read More »

Banks & Banking – Constitutional – TARP & EEPA – Real Property – Foreclosure (access required)

CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Kokolis The third-party plaintiff seeks actual and punitive damages against third-party defendants the U.S. Treasury Department and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, but nowhere in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) or the Administrative Procedure Act is there a provision permitting money damages for alleged injury caused by actions taken pursuant to the EESA.

Read More »
Scroll To Top