Hansen v. Fields Co. (Lawyers Weekly No. 010-097-14, 8 pp.) (Kaye Hearn, J.) Appealed from Charleston County Circuit Court (Kristi Harrington, J.) S.C. S. Ct. Holding: Since the defendant-LLC never ratified any of its promoter’s preformation contracts, the LLC is ...Read More »
McPheely v. Adams Since plaintiffs’ allegations indicate that they did not purchase shares of nominal defendant Scio Diamond Technology Corp. until June 1, 2012 at the earliest, plaintiffs lack standing to complain of any alleged wrongdoing that occurred before June 2012.
Tagged with: ArbitrationRead More »
Kriti Ripley, LLC v. Emerald Investments, LLC Plaintiffs Kriti Rippley, LLC and Ashley River Properties II, LLC have a judgment against Kriti’s fellow member of Ashley – defendant Emerald Investments, LLC -- and Emerald’s owner, defendant Longman; plaintiffs have had a charging order against Emerald’s interest in Ashley for two and a half years; plaintiffs have received no payments toward the judgment; and Ashley has not and is not in a position to make distributions; therefore, foreclosure is the appropriate remedy.
Tagged with: ForeclosureRead More »
Menezes v. WL Ross & Co Under Delaware law, plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary duty claim arose when the terms of a merger between his former employer and another company were approved by the employer’s board of directors, not when the merger was officially closed by vote of the shareholders.
Tagged with: Fiduciary DutyRead More »
Dumit v. Holtzman Although the parties personally guaranteed their limited liability company’s original debt, the refinancing of that debt wiped out the personal guaranties. Because the LLC’s operating agreement prohibits a right to contribution, plaintiff cannot use his relationship with defendant as a member of the LLC to seek contribution. Moreover, plaintiff has not shown the elements necessary to establish contribution independent of his role as an LLC member.
Tagged with: LLC DebtRead More »
Park Regency, LLC v. R&D Development of the Carolinas, LLCIn this case filed to dissociate a member from a limited liability company, the trial court did not err in fashioning relief from the entirety of the parties’ agreement, rather than limiting its review to the dissociation provisions.
Tagged with: Real PropertyRead More »
Ballard v. Roberson Investor shareholders oppress minority a shareholder pursuant to Section 33-14-300(2)(ii) of the South Carolina Code by inappropriately amending their Articles of Incorporation to freeze out the founder by removing his control and substantially diluting his ownership interest.Read More »
Bowen v. Houser Even though shares of stock are the personal property of the plaintiff-shareholders, and even though any decrease in the market value of the shares is a direct loss to each shareholder’s personal property, a decrease in the value of all outstanding stock is in no way “separate” or “distinct” from the harm to the corporation that causes such a decrease.Read More »
Corporate – Shareholders’ Lawsuit – Direct Claims – Stock Price Decline – Derivative Claims Only – Banks & Banking – Tort/Negligence
Rice-Marko v. Wachovia Corp. Since the plaintiff-shareholders are complaining about the diminution in the value of their stock, they have no direct claim against the defendant-banks or the defendant-bank officers. We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing plaintiffs’ claims.Read More »