Quantcast
Don't Miss
Home / Tag Archives: Disbarment

Tag Archives: Disbarment

Feed Subscription

The sins of the father (access required)

Long time Columbia city councilman and convicted felon E.W. Cromartie II had an interesting argument for why the South Carolina Supreme Court shouldn’t disbar him from the profession. Cromartie, who spent ten months in federal prison for tax evasion, asked the court during an Oct. 4 hearing not to strip him of law license because he feared it would hurt his namesake son, E.W. Cromartie III, who is also an attorney.

Read More »

Attorneys – Discipline – Disbarment – Clients’ Funds – Mother’s Estate (access required)

In re Hemingway Respondent failed to protect the liens of two of his personal-injury clients’ medical providers, failed to comply with court orders when he was administering his mother’s estate, failed to disburse settlement funds to another client, and accepted a retainer fee while he was on interim suspension.

Read More »

Attorneys – Discipline – Disbarment – Stealing Client Funds (access required)

In re Taylor Where respondent (1) embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars of client funds in order to support a lavish lifestyle, (2) failed to safeguard other client funds, (3) incurred debt in his wife’s name without her knowledge, (4) pled guilty to breach of trust with fraudulent intent, and (5) failed to respond to inquiries by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, we agree with the recommendation of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct panel’s recommendation that respondent be disbarred.

Read More »

Attorneys – Discipline – Disbarment – Failure to Respond – Abandonment of Practice (access required)

In re Hursey Due to respondent’s failure to answer the formal charges against him, he is deemed to have admitted the factual allegations in 13 disciplinary matters. Further, respondent has abandoned his law practice without regard to the status of his law license. Respondent has never communicated with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and he did not appear before this court. We disbar respondent.

Read More »

Attorneys – Discipline – Disbarment – Inadequate Representation – Violations of State Law & Court Orders (access required)

In re Davis Where respondent violated state law and the orders of this court, and where he failed to adequately represent clients, sufficiently respect the rights of third parties, or satisfy adverse monetary judgments, respondent is not fit to practice law.

Read More »

Attorneys – Discipline – Trust Account Misconduct – Clients’ Funds – Response to Investigation – Disbarment (access required)

In re Steinmeyer Respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct in numerous ways: (1) she failed to report another lawyer’s violation of the Rules for three years; (2) she deposited a client’s funds into her personal bank account; (3) her secretary signed and notarized an ejectment application such that it appeared to have been signed by a magistrate; (4) she wrote checks on her trust account for non-client related expenses, and there were insufficient funds in the account to pay the checks; (5) she misappropriated funds intended for clients; (6) she was arrested on drug and DUI charges; (7) she failed to file a complaint on behalf of a client; and (8) she failed to respond to communications from the Officer of Disciplinary Counsel.

Read More »

Attorneys – Discipline – Trust Account Misconduct – Clients’ Funds – Response to Investigation — Disbarment (access required)

In re Steinmeyer Respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct in numerous ways: (1) she failed to report another lawyer’s violation of the Rules for three years; (2) she deposited a client’s funds into her personal bank account; (3) her secretary signed and notarized an ejectment application such that it appeared to have been signed by a magistrate; (4) she wrote checks on her trust account for non-client related expenses, and there were insufficient funds in the account to pay the checks; (5) she misappropriated funds intended for clients; (6) she was arrested on drug and DUI charges; (7) she failed to file a complaint on behalf of a client; and (8) she failed to respond to communications from the Officer of Disciplinary Counsel.

Read More »
Scroll To Top