Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Juvenile – Polygraph Evidence

By: S.C. Lawyers Weekly staff//May 22, 2000

Juvenile – Polygraph Evidence

By: S.C. Lawyers Weekly staff//May 22, 2000

Where a juvenile, who has been found delinquent on two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor, alleges that the Family Court abused its discretion in refusing to admit evidence that he passed a polygraph test concerning the allegations against him, we hold that, before the Family Court ruled on the admissibility of the polygraph evidence, it should have held a hearing pursuant to principles enunciated in State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1 (1999).

Having said this, we order a remand for such a hearing. If the Family Court, in its discretion, decides the evidence is admissible under the standard explained in Council, it should order a new trial.

As to other issues raised here, we decide: that the juvenile served his notice of appeal in timely fashion; and that the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged offenses occurred between August 1996 and September 1997, as alleged in the juvenile petition.

In the Interest of: Robert R. (Lawyers Weekly No. 011-072-00) (6 pages) (Morehead, A.J.) (SCCOA) Appealed from a decision issued by Turbeville, J., in the Sumter County Family Court. J. Edward Bell III for the juvenile; Charles M. Condon, John W. McIntosh, Harold M. Coombs Jr. and Cecil Kelly Jackson for the state (No. 3165) (May 22, 2000).

Business Law

See all Business Law News

Commentary

See all Commentary

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...