Robert and Susan Coake sold their Anderson property in January 2006, about a year before the housing market began its long tumble. They sold the property for $440,000 after purchasing it in 2004 from Kathleen Burt for $296,900. They enjoyed a nice profit, but in order to get it, they spent $38,390 on repairs and improvements - $10,090 of which they attributed to Burt's alleged failure to disclose certain defects in the property. The Coakes sued Burt alleging that she violated the Disclosure Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 27-50-80, by filling out a disclosure form but failing to alert them to the defects. Greenville attorney Kirsten E. Small (pictured) of Nexsen Pruet, who represented the Coakes, said the suit wasn't as much about the $10,090 as "the principle of not knowing what they were getting when they bought the house because of the disclosures."
Enter your email address/USER ID and password in the fields above to gain access to the subscriber content on this site.
Your subscription includes one set of login credentials for your exclusive use. Security features have been integrated on this site: If someone signs in with your credentials while you are logged in, the site will automatically close your ongoing login and you will lose access at that time. To inquire about group subscriptions for your organization, contact Joann Griffin.
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? Click Here to register.
Forgot password or User ID?