State v. Williams
Twelve hours after his arrest, defendant began saying his shooting victim had had a gun. The trial court allowed the state to comment on defendant’s initial post-arrest silence four times in violation of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976). Although defendant only objected the first two times, we find the state’s comments to be prejudicial because the state attempted to show that, if defendant acted in self-defense, he would have immediately explained this to the police. Because the state directly tied defendant’s silence to his claim of self-defense, the error cannot be harmless.
Enter your email address/USER ID and password in the fields above to gain access to the subscriber content on this site.
Your subscription includes one set of login credentials for your exclusive use. Security features have been integrated on this site: If someone signs in with your credentials while you are logged in, the site will automatically close your ongoing login and you will lose access at that time. To inquire about group subscriptions for your organization, contact Joann Griffin.
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? Click Here to register.
Forgot password or User ID?