By: Teresa Bruno, Opinions Editor//October 28, 2016
By: Teresa Bruno, Opinions Editor//October 28, 2016
DeLoach v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Lawyers Weekly No. 002-205-16, 6 pp.) (J. Michelle Childs, J.) 1:16-cv-02377; D.S.C.
Holding: Even though defendant Simmons – who, like plaintiff, is a South Carolina resident – was the one who placed plastic on the floor, failed to remove it, and failed to warn of the danger she created, since plaintiff seeks to impose liability on the out-of-state corporate defendants based on the theory of respondeat superior, plaintiff’s claim is an acknowledgement that Simmons was acting within the scope of her employment. An hourly employee, like Simmons, has no duty to maintain a safe premises if that employee does not have a substantial level of control over the premises; therefore, there is no possibility that plaintiff can establish a cause of action against Simmons in state court.
Plaintiff’s motion to remand is denied.