Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digests / Attorneys / Attorneys – Discipline – Suspension – Diligence – QDRO

Attorneys – Discipline – Suspension – Diligence – QDRO

Where respondent (1) failed to keep clients reasonably informed, (2) failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness, (3) failed to pay $2,500 to a client after the Resolution of Fee Disputes Board instructed him to do so, and (4) took approximately a decade to have three Qualified Domestic Relations Orders prepared, respondent violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.15, 3.2, and 3.4(c).

Respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this state for 12 months. Respondent shall pay the costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

In re Gorski (Lawyers Weekly No. 010-076-18, 3 pp.) (Per Curiam) John Nichols and Ericka Williams for Office of Disciplinary Counsel; William Gorski, pro se. S.C. S. Ct.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*