Free Newsletter
Insurance – Flood – No Proof of Loss
By: Teresa Bruno, Opinions Editor//July 27, 2018
Plaintiffs failed to submit a proof of loss for the items at issue in this lawsuit within 60 days of the flood, and – lacking a waiver from the Federal Insurance Administration – they have failed to meet the pre-suit requirements under their Standard Flood Insurance Policy. As a result of their failure to meet the requirements of the SFIP, plaintiffs are prohibited from seeking additional payments from the defendant-insurer.
The court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Monticello Road, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance (Lawyers Weekly No. 002-155-18, 7 pp.) (Margaret Seymour, S.J.) 3:17-cv-00730. John Calvin Bradley Jr. and Stephen Jahue Moore for plaintiffs; J. Drayton Hastie III, Laura Robinson, Joseph Aguda, Jeffrey Michael Bogdan and Morris Dawes Cooke Jr. for defendants. D.S.C.
Business Law
- Economy forces attorneys to get down to business
- Business Court judges trawl for customers
- Va. company's Web site did not subject business to personal jurisdiction in S.C., appeals panel rules
- Former running back from S.C. wins courtroom victory in contract dispute
- Contract – Government Contract – Qui Tam – False Claims Act
- Licenses & Permits – Beer & Wine Permit – Restrictive Covenant – Suitable Location
- Consumer Protection – FCRA – Auto Loan – Bank Accounting Errors
- Licenses & Permits – Veterinarian – Vaccine Maintenance
- Tort – Business Tort – Va. Computer Crimes Act – Trade Secrets
- Textile firm, railroad settle Graniteville train wreck lawsuit
- State regulators look at car dealer accused of lying to customers
- Subprime mortgage meltdown hits securities law
Commentary
- Virginia Tech student got due process in hearing
- High court justices cross the line of propriety
- High court’s term was rough on big business
- The flip side of generative AI in law and how to address it
- The fight for equal educational opportunity continues
- Letter From The Editor – Working from Home
- NLRB joins FTC in taking aim at non-competes
- Supreme Court leaves key internet protection untouched
- US Supreme Court bites back at parody’s use of the First Amendment
- My goal: Provide the information that you need now
- Case study: North Carolina courts provide guidance on scope, limitations of attorney-client privilege
- A Different Ode to Pro Bono Work
Polls
Loading ...
SC Lawyers Weekly keeps you connected with the latest legal news, Daily Practice and Breaking
News alerts.
Sign-up for SC Lawyers Weekly Email Alerts
