Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Attorneys – Discipline – Disbarment – Failure to Communicate – Trust Account

By: S.C. Lawyers Weekly staff//March 12, 2019

Attorneys – Discipline – Disbarment – Failure to Communicate – Trust Account

By: S.C. Lawyers Weekly staff//March 12, 2019

Among other things, respondent failed to (1) communicate with his clients, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, or this court; (2) diligently represent his clients; and (3) maintain accurate records for his trust account. Respondent admits that he violated several provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.1 (competence); Rule 1.3 (diligence); Rule 1.4 (communication); Rule 1.5 (fees); Rule 1.15(a) (safeguarding client property); Rule 1.15(b) (commingling funds); Rule 1.15(c) (keeping of unearned legal fees in trust account); Rule 1.16 (declining or terminating representation); Rule 3.3(a) (making a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or failing to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer); Rule 3.4(c) (disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal); Rule 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary investigation); Rule 8.1(b) (failing to respond to a demand for information from a disciplinary authority); Rule 8.4(a) (violating the Rules of Professional Conduct); and Rule 8.4(e) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).

Respondent is disbarred.

In re Cornwell (Lawyers Weekly No. 010-009-19, 6 pp.) (Per curiam) John Nichols and Ericka McCants Williams for the ODC; Fulton Casey Dale Cornwell, pro se. S.C. S. Ct.

Business Law

See all Business Law News

Commentary

See all Commentary

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...