State v. Odems Where the state’s circumstantial evidence showed only that (1) when stopped by a sheriff’s deputy, defendant was in the vehicle used by Derrick Dawkins and Frederick Bell to leave the scene of a robbery 90 minutes earlier and (2) following the stop, defendant fled along with Dawkins and Bell, the state’s evidence does not reasonably tend to prove defendant’s guilt.
We reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming defendant’s convictions of first-degree burglary, grand larceny, criminal conspiracy and malicious injury.
Tagged with: Burglary Circumstantial Evidence Criminal Practice Insufficient
Read More »