South Carolina Lawyers Weekly staff//February 24, 2025//
South Carolina Lawyers Weekly staff//February 24, 2025//
Action: Settlement
Date: Oct. 11, 2024
Date of incident: April 3, 2023
Nature of claim: Vehicle collision leading to death
Injuries alleged: Decedent killed by head injury on impact
Amount: $10 million
Name of case: Withheld
Case number: Withheld
Court: Withheld
Tried before: Mediator
Name of mediator: Kurt Rozelsky, of Spencer Fane, Greenville
Demand: Withheld
Highest offer: Withheld
Attorneys: Paul Hammack and Jamie Ackermann, of Hammack Law Firm, Greenville (for the plaintiff)
Decedent, the driver of a passenger car, had come to a controlled stop at an intersection. Defendant driver was driving a tractor trailer. He was distracted by talking on a phone and failed to pay attention to the road for at least 15 seconds after the traffic signal turned yellow and 10 seconds after it turned red. He braked about 1 second before impact.
The collision crushed the rear of decedent’s car and killed him upon impact.
During a canvass of the area, investigators for plaintiff’s counsel obtained a video of the event that showed decedent’s controlled stop and the rear-end collision seconds later.
Aggravating factors included defendant driver not being trained by his company in the required Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, spoliation of evidence (the phone being used the date of the crash), defendant driver failing to take full responsibility for the crash and defendant driver attempting to shift blame by arguing that decedent braked sharply and stopped suddenly at the light.
There was no survival claim, and decedent did not work, ruling out economic damages. There was significant punitive exposure which plaintiff’s counsel uncovered through discovery. There was an impasse at mediation, but the case was settled a week later.
Plaintiff in the case was the adult child of decedent.