Civil Practice – South Carolina Tort Claims Act – State-Law Immunity
The district court erred in relying on a determination that S.C. Code § 15-78-60(2) extends to non-discretionary acts. We vacated in part and remanded. A South Carolina state court judge […]
Civil Practice – Class Certification – Door Closing Statute
Rule 23 governs Plaintiff’s claims, and the district court erred by applying the Door Closing Statute. We reversed the district court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for class certification and remanded. […]
Civil Practice – Estoppel – Personal Service
Plaintiffs failed to preserve an action against Defendant at-fault driver because they neither personally served him with the summons and complaint nor achieved personal service through his voluntary appearance within […]
Civil Practice – Specific Personal Jurisdiction – Forum-Specific Conduct
The circuit court did not err in holding that the allegations in the complaint did not establish a prima facie case of specific jurisdiction. We affirmed the order of the […]
Civil Practice – Statute of Limitations – Exercise of Reasonable Diligence
Appellant Bierer and Associates claims were barred as a matter of law and the trial court did not err by granting Respondents’ motions for summary judgment. We affirmed the trial […]
Civil Practice – Discovery Sanctions – Appointment of a Receiver
The sanctions were plainly justified and the appointment of the Receiver was also within the trial court’s discretion. We affirmed the order granting sanctions, and we affirmed the portion of […]
Civil Practice – South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act – Statute of Limitations
Because the 2020 action was timely served and filed, and the 2020 action was then consolidated without prejudice with the 2017 action, the circuit court erred in dismissing the claims […]
Civil Practice – Removal of Lawsuits from State Court to Federal Court – Requisite Nexus
The district courts must consider whether 3M Company satisfied the other elements needed to avail itself of a federal forum under § 1442(a)(1). We vacated the district courts’ decisions and […]
Civil Practice – Friedler v. Stifel, Nicolaus, & Co. – Challenges to Arbitration Award
Friedler altered the way we assess federal jurisdiction over petitions to vacate and confirm arbitration awards, and it controls here. Therefore, Friedler compels a holding of no subject matter jurisdiction. […]
Civil Practice – Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act – Justiciable Controversy
The legal right Appellants asserted is at stake is the right to have a court of the unified judicial system decide their contract claims. They legally and knowingly waived this […]
Civil Practice – Attorneys’ Fees – Breach of Contract
Fast Formliners Company is entitled to a reasonable award of attorneys’ fees because it was the prevailing party. We affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a proper […]
Criminal Practice – Evidence – Requisite Intent
Defendant’s convictions for kidnapping resulting in death, carjacking resulting in death, and using a firearm during or in relation to a crime of violence resulting in death are supported by […]
Business Law
- Economy forces attorneys to get down to business
- Business Court judges trawl for customers
- Va. company's Web site did not subject business to personal jurisdiction in S.C., appeals panel rules
- Former running back from S.C. wins courtroom victory in contract dispute
- Contract – Government Contract – Qui Tam – False Claims Act
- Consumer Protection – FCRA – Auto Loan – Bank Accounting Errors
- Tort – Business Tort – Va. Computer Crimes Act – Trade Secrets
Commentary
- Off the record: Sealing evictions and restoring housing security
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge



.png)





