Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Attorneys – Discipline – Reprimand – Assault

By: South Carolina Lawyers Weekly staff//April 20, 2022//

Attorneys – Discipline – Reprimand – Assault

By: South Carolina Lawyers Weekly staff//April 20, 2022//

Listen to this article

Respondent engaged in an argument with his wife, which escalated to the point that it was reasonable for his wife to fear imminent harm. Respondent was charged with felony first-degree domestic violence but entered a plea of no contest to third-degree simple assault. Respondent violated Rule 8.4(b) (prohibiting criminal acts that reflect adversely on fitness as a lawyer) and 8.4(c) (prohibiting conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice).

We accept the agreement for discipline by consent, reprimand respondent, and order him to pay the costs of the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

In re Wilson (Lawyers Weekly No. 010-015-22, 2 pp.) (Per curiam) (Kaye Hearn, J., not participating) John Nichols and Kelly Arnold for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel; George Hearn for respondent. S.C. S. Ct.

Business Law

See all Business Law News

Commentary

See all Commentary

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...