Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Ruling boosts challenges to federal regulations

The Associated Press//July 2, 2024//

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in Nvidia’s appeal of a lower court ruling that allowed a class action lawsuit filed in 2018 by a Swedish investment firm to continue. (Associated Press file)

Ruling boosts challenges to federal regulations

The Associated Press//July 2, 2024//

Listen to this article

WASHINGTON — The opened the door Monday to new, broad challenges to long after they take effect, the third blow in a week to .

The justices ruled 6-3 in favor of a in North Dakota that wants to sue over a regulation on debit card swipe that the federal appeals court in Washington upheld 10 years ago.

Federal law sets a six-year deadline for broad challenges to regulations. In this case, the regulation from the governing the fees must pay whenever customers use a debit card took effect in 2011.

The deadline for lawsuits over the regulation was in 2017.

, a truck stop in Watford City, North Dakota, didn’t open until 2018.

Still, a federal appeals court dismissed the challenge as too late.

The company appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Biden administration had urged the court to uphold the because otherwise, governmental agencies would be subject to endless challenges.

The decision could take on new significance in the wake of last week’s ruling that overturned the 1984 Chevron decision that made it easier to uphold regulations across a wide swath of American life. The court also stripped the Securities and Exchange Commission of a major tool to fight securities fraud.

Chief Justice John Roberts captured the dilemma facing the court when the Corner Post case was argued in February. Agencies could face repeated challenges “10 years later, 20 years later” and “sort of have to create the universe, you know, repeatedly.”

On the other hand, Roberts said, “You have an individual or an entity that is harmed by something the government is doing, and you’re saying, well, that’s just too bad, you can’t do anything about it because other people had six years to do something about it.”

The legal principle that everybody is entitled to their day in court, Roberts said, “doesn’t say unless somebody else had a day in court.”


Business Law

See all Business Law News

Commentary

See all Commentary

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...