Fraud scheme targeting immigrants leads to $811 million judgment

Listen to this article

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a massive judgment exceeding $811 million and a permanent injunction against several corporate and individual defendants accused

of orchestrating a nationwide fraud scheme that exploited vulnerable immigrants seeking release from federal custody.

The plaintiffs — the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the attorneys general of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia — brought a civil enforcement action against two related companies and their executives for deceiving immigrant consumers detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The defendants marketed what they called an “easy and affordable” service to help immigrants secure release on immigration bonds. In reality, the court found, the companies charged exorbitant and deceptive fees, failed to deliver promised services, and subjected consumers to abusive practices, all in violation of federal and state consumer protection laws.

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia entered default judgment and imposed both monetary and injunctive relief after finding the defendants repeatedly violated court orders and deadlines and engaged in litigation misconduct. On appeal, the defendants argued the court abused its discretion in entering default judgment, improperly excluded their evidence at a remedies hearing, issued an overly broad injunction in violation of Rule 65(d), and miscalculated the monetary award.

The 4th Circuit rejected each of these arguments, concluding that the lower court acted within its discretion and that the sanctions and remedies were fully supported by the record. The appellate court emphasized that the defendants’ misconduct and disregard for judicial orders justified the severe sanctions imposed.

The 23-page opinion is Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services Inc., Lawyers Weekly No. 001-166-25.